(Culley, 1988). This is a source of concern in Colleges of Education where females historically

outnumber males in the student body by a factor of more than 3.5 to 1 (Digest of Education

Statistics, 1995, Table 241).

If for discussion alphais adjusted to equal .1, significant results are found for research

hypothesis 1: There are no gender differences in students’ perceptions of how difficult/easy

it is to use computers in ALNs (seeTable 1), [F (4,49) = 2.310; p< .1]. Rejecting the null

hypothesis of the MANOVA for hypothesis 1, we can now examine the 4 dependent variables of

this question for significance. We find two variables where the ANOVA tests show significant

results. The survey question: “How would you describe computers: • difficult to use, • somewhat

difficult, • somewhat easy, • easy to use -- produced significant results [F (1,52) = 5.347; p<

.05]. A similar question: “How would you describe the World Wide Web: • difficult to use, •

somewhat difficult, • somewhat easy, • easy to use -- produced significant results [F (1,52) =

4.964; p< .05]. This also supports prior research that males may be more practiced using

computer technology than females. Additional research is needed to verify these gender based

differences. It seems possible that increases in the use of ALNs in university curricula may favor

male students, at lease initially.

Beyond this study’s scope, ALNs are becoming increasingly important as additions to the

traditional classroom and as a medium for delivery of complete semester long courses, and are

expanding to include complete degree granting programs. Frank Mayadas (1997) writes:

“Progress is being made toward the goal of providing anyone who wishes
to learn, the opportunity to study in a time, a place, and a field of their choice. Can
this progress be sustained or accelerated? The self-study and interactive televised
classroom models, with occasional augmentation by e-mail communications, are
well established. It would seem that a multiplicity of approaches is likely to co-exist
in the future. Asynchronous Learning Networks can grow to become an important,
even dominant, presence in off-campus education. Existing organizations, which
specialize in networked education, and newly formed organizations such as
fledgling Internet universities, are likely to contribute to this growth.”

A community based university ignores these advanced uses of computer technology at its

peril. Students attend community colleges because they are convenient and inexpensive. With

advances in ALNs, competition will not be limited to near by institutions. Competition will also

ALNs in a University, Page 10

come form schools with virtualcampuses that can reach students anywhere with just the right

content at just the right time ... just enough, just in time. Any public university in a large

metropolitan area will need curricula goals that include many possible uses of ALNs -- for all

students, affordable convenient, just enough, just in time.

Future studies like this one should begin to look at other effects of ALN use in college

curricula. Do ALNs work? Do people learn in these environments? Will ALN-style learning appeal

to a variety of learners across a broad range of disciplines? Over time, we will learn whether

asynchronous learning is more effective in some disciplines than others, and we will learn more

about student and faculty characteristics, which lead to success in ALNs. For example, we may

find that gender is a factor. At a more practical level, we might apply different kinds of measures.

We can ask, for instance, whether the evidence we have supports a conclusion that the learning that

takes place in ALNs is equivalent to traditional classroom learning. We also need to assess the

demand side to insure that learners are enrolling in properly delivered and properly supported ALN

programs?

Progress is being made toward the goal of providing anyone who wishes to learn, the

opportunity to study in a time, a place, and a field of their choice. Can this progress be sustained or

accelerated? The self-study and interactive televised classroom models, with occasional

augmentation by e-mail communications, are well established. It would seem that a multiplicity of

approaches is likely to co-exist in the future. Asynchronous Learning Networks can grow to

become an important, even dominant, presence in off-campus education. Existing organizations,

which specialize in networked education, and newly formed organizations such as fledgling

Internet universities, are likely to contribute to this growth. The highest potential for large-scale

ALNs will, however, come from mainstream, campus-based institutions because of their sheer

numbers and overall presence.

ALNs in a University, Page 11

References

Bourne, John R. (1998), Net-Learning: Strategies for On-Campus and Off-Campus

Network-enabled Learning, Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 2(2)

Culley, O. (1988), Option choice and career guidance: Gender and computing in secondary

schools. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 16 (1), 73-82

Dambrot, F.H. (1985), The correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and

involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27 (1), 71-86

Digest of Education Statistics(1995), Table 241, National Center for Education Statistics,

General Accounting Office,( http://nces.ed.gov/pubsold/D95/dtab241.html)

Hiltz, Starr Roxanne. (1997). Impacts of college-level courses via Asynchronous Learning

Networks: Some Preliminary Results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks[Online], 1

(2), 59 paragraphs. Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue2/hiltz.htm.

Karma, I. (1994), Setting up your own network.Green Teacher, 37, 26-28

Kramarae, C. and Taylor, J., Women (1993), Information, Technology, and Scholarship.

Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press

Maher, Frances and Thompson Tetrault, Mary Kay (1992), Inside Feminist Classrooms:

An Ethnographic Approach, Teaching For Diversity (49)

Mayadas, Frank. (1997). Asynchronous Learning Networks: A Sloan Foundation

Perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks[Online], 1 (1), 61 paragraphs.

Available: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue1/mayadas.htm[12 December 1997].

Merriam, Sharan B. andCaffarella, Rosemary S. (1991), Toward Comprehensive

Theories of Adult Learning, Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide, Jossey-Bass

Publishers, Inc.

ALNs in a University, Page 12