Attitudes and Use of ALNs in a University Setting: Gender Differences and Similarities
With the growth of global information networks such as the World Wide Web, many
universities are integrating Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) into their curricula. This
paper presents the results of a survey of male and female students’ use of and attitudes about
ALNs. Results revealed no significant gender differences. Ease-of-use of the underling computer
components of ALNs reveal that males may be more practiced than females with this technology.
Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) are an outgrowth of the increasing importance
of computers in education. ALNs are on-line learning venues that emphasize non-concurrent
people-to-people communications. This contrasts with the face-to-face, synchronous networks of
Teaching to differences is a general curricula goal well defined by Feminists Pedagogues
(Maher, 1992). Most university student bodies are over 50 percent female and are becoming
increasingly ethnically diverse. Students in the Colleges of Education bring many differences to the
classroom. Because of the importance of these diversity issues, research should continue to insure
that gender based differences are not found in the future as universities increase the ALN
component of required course work. In Colleges of Education, these concerns carry more weight
because females outnumber males by a factor of more than 3 to 1 (Digest of Education Statistics,
1995). This and other research points out that increases in the use of ALNs in university curricula
may favor male students, at lease initially. Administrators and curricula designers cannot appear to
favoring one group of students over another.
Effective Teaching, Page 9
Chism Nancy (1994), Taking Student Diversity into Account, In Feldman, Denneth A. and
Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 185-
Dressel, Paul L. and Marcus, Dora (1982) Teaching Styles and Effects on Learning, In
Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in the College
Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 495-502). Sinon &Schuster.
Digest of Education Statistics(1995), Table 241, National Center for Education Statistics,
Feldman, Denneth A. (1997) Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching:Evidence from
Student Ratings, In Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning
in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 391-414). Sinon &Schuster.
Maher, Fraces and Tetreault, Kay Thompson (1992) Inside Feminist Classrooms: An
Ethnographic Approach, In Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and
Learning in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 515526). Sinon &Schuster.
Merrian, Sharan B. and Caffarella, Rosemary S. (1991) Toward Comprehensive Theories
of Adult Learning, In Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and
Learning in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 117-124). Sinon &Schuster.
Murray, Harry G. and Renaud, Robert D. (1995) Disciplainary Differences in Classroom
Teaching Behaviors, In Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and
Learning in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 299-305). Sinon &Schuster.
Schommer, Jarlene (1994) An Emerging Conceptualization of Epistemological Beliefs and
Their Role in Learning In Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and
Learning in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 173-184). Sinon &Schuster.
Smith, Barbara Leigh and MacGregor, Jean T. (1992) What is Collaborative Learning?, In
Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in the College
Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 585-596). Sinon &Schuster.
Svincike, Marilla D. and Dixon, Nancy M. (1987) The Kolb Model Modified for
Classroom Activities, In Feldman, Denneth A. and Paulsen, Michael B. (Eds.), Teaching and
Learning in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed., (pp. 557-584). Sinon &Schuster.