Getting into Position to Think

A Reflection on My Progress as a Doctoral Student

presented to:

Gregory Levitt, major professor

Renee Casbergue

Mike Paulsen

Jeff Oescher

Shengru Tu

In partial fulfillment of requirements for the General Exam

in the Curriculum and Instruction Ph.D. program

at the University of New Orleans

by

George J. North, Jr.

part of a General Exam Portfolio
July, 1999

Getting into Position to Think
a Reflection

This paper is organized into four sections. The purpose of each is to relate my

content area, computer science, to my new role as an educator. In Why I’m here, my

intent is to show my sentiments. Why, at this time in my live, it is important for

me to become a doctor of philosophy. How I think about learningtells my story of

life-long learning and indicates my learning philosophy. What is changingrelates

recent advances in computer science to educational systems. In the final section,

Customized Learning, I discuss a teaching philosophy and its relationship to the

changing role of computers in education. The idea is to get computers out of

education. Teaching technology only makes sense to those of us born before the

development of that technology. Today, every school age American (5 to 22) was

born after the introduction of personal computers. Its time to move beyond using

computer to augment existing C&I practice and to consider how to migrate theory

and practice to accommodate an information revolution and the needs of life-long

learners.

Why I’m here.

I didn’t know Douglas Engelbart until after I returned to school in 1993, the

twenty-fifth year of my career as a computer scientist. As with most visionaries, it

has taken me and the world a long time to catch up with Douglas Engelbart.

Although his work took place in relative isolation, he is well known in scientific

and academic communities. His ideas have profoundly touched us all. During the

1950s the digital electronic computer was being conceived as a sophisticated

calculating machine. He saw it as a tool for expanding the mind's creative abilities.

During the same period when the computer's most celebrated function was to

Reflection, Page 2

calculate artillery trajectories for the military, he was talking about human-

computer interactivity, collaborative informational systems, and other innovations

that would become the norm much later, in the 90s.

Try to imagine "personal" computing without the mouse, the pointer cursor,

word processing, outline processing (presentations), multiple remote online users of

a networked processor (the Internet), linking and in-file object addressing (multi-

media), multiple windows, and hypermedia (the Web). These features, which we

take for granted in 1999, were unheard of before Douglas Engelbart's inquiries into

Augmented Human Intellectled to a revolutionary vision of the computer. This

vision was revealed to the computer world on December 9, 1968 ... when he and his

research team presented to the world their creation, NLS (oN Line System) at the

Joint Computer Conference in San Francisco's Civic Center.

All of these attributes of computers we take for granted today were

envisioned and implemented by Douglas Engelbart before Windows, before

Macintosh, before personal computers, and before the Internet. In 1989 (the year that

Tim Berners-Lee gave birth to the World Wide Web), Engelbart formed the

Bootstrap Institute. When explaining the focus of his organization, Engelbart (1999)

talks about boosting collective IQ, and an open hyperdocument system:

Suppose that you somehow developed an intuitive conviction
that emergent computer and communication technology brings with it
the possibility of significantly boosting the Collective IQ of human
organizations and institutions.
For decades now, I have believed this -- and further, that
significantly boosting our collective IQ should be one of mankind's
front-runner grand challenges.
The organization -- or community, or institution, or country --
that most effectively pursues such a goal will gain critically significant
advantage for its future well being, if not for its survival.

Reflection, Page 3